![]() In Conclusion | I think that the new Pat McGrath foundation is stunning. Related Post | Armani Luminous Silk Foundation Swatches What was interesting, was that after 7 hours there was no perceivable shade difference between the Armani and PMG. I did think that the PMG photographed really bright and beautiful. I found that the Pat McGrath peach toned foundations had much more yellow in than vs the Armani. I originally was going to purchase a shade 4, however, I ended up actually being a mix of shades 8 + 10. With Armani, I get a perfect match with just shade 4.25.Īlso, I found that the PMG range runs very light. Shades | While the Pat McGrath has six more shades vs Armani Luminous Silk, I did feel like I had to combine both shades 8 + 10 to get a good match for my skin. I could definitely feel it slightly more on my skin and had to set it with a bit more powder vs the Armani.įinish | The PMG claims to be more matte, but I found it had almost an identical satin/matte finish to the Luminous Silk on my skin. ![]() However, if you love the feeling of serum foundations, you will love the Pat McGrath.īoth foundations felt virtually weightless once blended.īoth foundations dry down on the skin, but I did find the PMG to be a bit more tactile when not set with a lot of powder. I prefer the more matte feel and texture of the Armani Luminous Silk. Texture | Both foundations are liquid, but I did feel as though the Pat McGrath had more of a serum foundation feel. Longevity | Even without setting spray, as you’ll see in the video below, I felt like both foundations lasted me 7-8 hours and still looked great, even after a workout.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |